Skip to comments.
Nearly $25M Available to Substance Use Prevention Coalitions in New Partnership Between ONDCP and CDC
whitehouse.gov ^
| February 18, 2020
| White House
Posted on 02/19/2020 8:58:40 AM PST by ransomnote
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: ransomnote
Wonder what the “cure” pill will be for Marijuana addiction AFTER they hook a few million folks.
To: Sacajaweau
Legalizing states have seen modest if any increases in marijuana use - and it's less addictive than alcohol.
3
posted on
02/19/2020 9:03:13 AM PST
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: Sacajaweau
The big question is how much of the $25,000,000 can be skimmed by grifters in blue city governments pretending to provide help?
4
posted on
02/19/2020 9:11:48 AM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
To: ransomnote
Young people have been reporting since well before any state had legalized that they could get marijuana almost as easily as cigarettes or beer, although the latter two are much more widespread among adults. The available evidence indicates that the best way of keeping a drug away from young people is to legalize it for adults - which gives its sellers an economic incentive to confine their sales to adults, namely the risk of losing their legal adult market.
5
posted on
02/19/2020 9:14:30 AM PST
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: NobleFree
Cannibis is medicine not a drug
Ask all the folks using CBD
6
posted on
02/19/2020 9:38:23 AM PST
by
Truthoverpower
(The guv mint you get is the Trump winning express !)
To: NobleFree
The available evidence indicates that the best way of keeping a drug away from young people is to legalize it for adults - which gives its sellers an economic incentive to confine their sales to adults, namely the risk of losing their legal adult market.No. The actual evidence shows that states like CO that legalize pot have high school students showing up to school under the infuence in greater numbers. The "legal" Drug cartels have made QUITE the propaganda campaign with fake studies supporting legalization. But schools have to help keep the truth quiet so many have policies which state that students will not be arrested or sent home for arriving to school high. School resource officers and some brave school counselors are sounding the alarm, but the "legalize pot" drug cartels have the money and power to silence objections...for now.
FOrtunately, PResident Trump has created some policy documents which will make it harder for states to legitimize dealing pot. I think it had something to do with federal funding. Don't have the link right now but it was very encouraging.
7
posted on
02/19/2020 9:52:21 AM PST
by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
To: ransomnote
The actual evidence shows that states like CO that legalize pot have high school students showing up to school under the infuence in greater numbers. Link?
FOrtunately, PResident Trump has created some policy documents which will make it harder for states to legitimize dealing pot.
I'll believe it when I see it. He's consistently been states-rights on this issue.
8
posted on
02/19/2020 10:32:08 AM PST
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: NobleFree
I believe I’ve seen you on other threads and I KNOW I’ve provided links on threads like this one, but those who favor legalization reject any information to the contrary. Sorry, but that’s been my experience; I’ve never seen anyone reconsider.
9
posted on
02/19/2020 10:45:56 AM PST
by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
To: ransomnote
FOrtunately, PResident Trump has created some policy documents which will make it harder for states to legitimize dealing pot. I think it had something to do with federal funding.You're probably thinking of the budget rider that has since 2014 prevented the use of DoJ funds for going after medical marijuana in states that allow it. Trump's latest budget proposal omits that rider - but so did his previous two budget proposals, and Congress re-inserted the rider.
IMO that omission is the DoJ Deep State trying to protect its historical prerogatives.
10
posted on
02/19/2020 10:46:30 AM PST
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: ransomnote
Ive never seen anyone reconsider.That doesn't relieve you of your responsibility for supporting your claims.
11
posted on
02/19/2020 10:48:57 AM PST
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: NobleFree
Doesn’t mean I have to “fetch” every time someone who just wants to deny the evidence orders me to.
12
posted on
02/19/2020 11:39:07 AM PST
by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
To: ransomnote
Deny WHAT "evidence"? So far all we have is your say-so.
13
posted on
02/19/2020 11:45:18 AM PST
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: ransomnote
14
posted on
02/19/2020 12:02:36 PM PST
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: ransomnote
"Data from the Colorado Department of Education show that that drug suspension rates increased from 391 (per 100,000 registered students) in the 2008‐09 school year to 551 in 2010‐11. The drug suspension rate fluctuated somewhat since then and was 507 in the 2017‐18 school year. The drug expulsion rate was 65 (per 100,000 registered students) in the 2008‐09 school year, increasing to 91 in 2010‐11, and then decreasing to 38 by 2017‐18. " - https://cdpsdocs.state.co.us/ors/docs/reports/2018-SB13-283_Rpt.pdf
15
posted on
02/19/2020 12:10:37 PM PST
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: NobleFree
"Data from the Colorado Department of Education show that that drug suspension rates increased from 391 (per 100,000 registered students) in the 2008‐09 school year to 551 in 2010‐11. The drug suspension rate fluctuated somewhat since then and was 507 in the 2017‐18 school year. The drug expulsion rate was 65 (per 100,000 registered students) in the 2008‐09 school year, increasing to 91 in 2010‐11, and then decreasing to 38 by 2017‐18. " - https://cdpsdocs.state.co.us/ors/docs/reports/2018-SB13-283_Rpt.pdf
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, yes... I have read that the last time we talked about this. The schools have policies to increase tolerance for drug use - they are now less inclined to discipline students AT ALL for drug offenses. Most won't suspend for drug use alone but more often in combination with other actions. SO, the numbers "look good" but the people who deal with the actual fallout (resource officers and school counselors) who aren't allowed to write the state reports reveal a sad situation that with drug use, more students showing up on campus high, their school performance drops etc.
I worked at a school that would not call the cops or suspend students for showing up high. They would retain the student on campus until their parents could pick them up and sometimes that meant until the end of the school day. Schools aren't required to call the cops because it either excites, upsets, or traumatizes students depending on their history, and they are too wired to study the rest of the day, week etc. Also, schools try to avoid contributing to student's rap sheets.
16
posted on
02/19/2020 12:33:58 PM PST
by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
To: ransomnote
the people who deal with the actual fallout (resource officers and school counselors) who aren't allowed to write the state reports reveal a sad situation that with drug use, more students showing up on campus highIn other words, the evidence is anecdotal. Got it.
17
posted on
02/19/2020 12:37:32 PM PST
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: NobleFree
In other words, the evidence is anecdotal. Got it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh if I post links, deniers scream they are biased. If I give first hand accounts (mine and that of resource officers and school counselors) you say it’s anecdotal. This is what I meant about not bothering to post to someone who only intends to reject any and all information contradicting them. The legalized drug cartel has a foothold in the right places and so adherents will only accept specific sources of information and shriek “LA LA LA LA I CAN’T HEAR YOU” through anything else. You got what you wanted.
18
posted on
02/19/2020 12:41:51 PM PST
by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
To: ransomnote
“the last time we talked about this.”
Speaking of previous exchanges:
‘So every study that doesn’t fit your preconceptions is “distorted” and “bought and paid for by the massive pot lobby” - but drug enforcement agents are an unbiased source of data.
‘ROTFLMAO!’
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3602041/replies?c=57
19
posted on
02/19/2020 12:43:12 PM PST
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: NobleFree
ROTFLMAO!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Still wasting my time? I posted as I did because those visiting this thread not hardened to their views might be interested to know that there is more to the story than meets the eye - the legal drug cartels have a grip and President Trump is workin’ on it.
20
posted on
02/19/2020 12:45:32 PM PST
by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson