[DiogenesLamp]

We should not allow any agency that carries large amounts of public speech traffic to censor it under any color of law. The act needs to be illegal, whether they are a "publisher" or a "carrier."

If they are putting forth only their opinions and not carrying public traffic, then sure, they can be a "publisher". But if they are carrying public traffic, they cannot be allowed to censor legal speech. Allowing this situation to continue may well destroy the nation, because virtually everything carry public speech nowadays belongs to "private" parties.

[Sam Gamgee]

I hate censorship of any kind and got some funny looks at bible study when I said I opposed banning porn sites.