Sounds like a formula for trouble at present and the near future at least. ??
Bob Ireland responds:
Sounds like a formula for trouble at present and the near future at least. ??
___________________________________
Yes, it does sound like trouble. I think JC Collins implies this in his article, which greeneyes excerpted here.
If you read the whole article, Collins seems to imply that President Trump’s “renegotiated trade deals” [eg. with China] and his “Make America Great” policies of increasing exports, reducing debt-to-GDP ratio, providing more jobs for Americans, etc. will not really make American great, but will merely provide a softer landing for Americans, in the face of what is deemed to be an inevitable transition to a “multilateral” world order.
JC Collins argues that Trump is just another globalist in disguise. I disagree. I trust Trump, and I trust the Plan. But I'd be better equipped to refute people like Collins if I knew a little more about the economic aspects of Trump's Plan.
George Soros & co. freely admit that they favor a "multilateral" system because — according to them — it will diminish US influence in the world. Are they right? Or is there some aspect of multilateralism that will actually benefit the USA (as some on this thread have suggested)?
At times like this, I really miss H. Ross Perot’s 30-minute infomercials, charts and pointers. Perot did a great job of educating Americans about the national debt, the balance of trade, deindustrialization, and other seemingly complex economic issues.
He proved that Americans are interested in these issues and fully capable of understanding them, if someone would just take the time and trouble to talk to us plainly about them.