Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
In practice or in statute?
The Virginia Supreme Court struck down the law in 2005 as “unconstitutional government intrusion,” though it remains in the Code of Virginia. The bill now moves to the Senate.
That’s from the article.
7 posted on 02/11/2020 9:48:21 AM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

There was nothing unconstitutional about such statutes.

When the Constitution was ratified such laws were known among the several States that ratified, therefore the right to consent to engage in sex outside of the bounds of marriage (which was common law marriage, not marriage licenses by the government) cannot be among the P&I addressed by A4:S2:C1 nor can they be covered by the 9th Amendment as those were not a right retained among the States at the time of its ratification.

The same is true of any statute against homosexuality.


37 posted on 02/11/2020 10:17:06 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson