Replies

I don't disagree. More evidence that LEOs were allowed to be involved.
I haven't found any evidence of NYPD involvement except for the True Pundit article(s) and Erik Prince's radio interview.

and read the beginning part of:

III. Seizure for Later Review of Electronically Stored Data
A. Seizure of Computer and Media

This warrant authorizes the seizure of a computer and electronic storage media as set forth below. In lieu of seizing any particular electronic storage media, this warrant also authorizes the copying of electronically stored information for later review. Electronic storage media which may be seized or copied include without limitation:

then it goes into the list of potential devices that you've listed.

Interestingly that OIG report of 06/2018 (which I am now going thru again - who knows what I've missed or misread) says that they worked with an "image" of the laptop. Maybe NYPD also got an image? Now to prove it.

For what it's worth, I have a heavily redacted SDNY agent affidavit to support the 10/30/2016 warrant. They needed another warrant because the FBI found Clinton's emails on the laptop and nobody had the authority to look at them.