The first time I heard of it was in the biography channel piece on Natalie Wood made in 2003. They didn't name Kirk Douglass directly to avoid a lawsuit, but gave a bunch of clues which made it obvious who they were talking about.
RE: They didn’t name Kirk Douglass directly to avoid a lawsuit, but gave a bunch of clues which made it obvious who they were talking about.
And that’s enough to convict the man as a rapist?
What did Natalie Wood say IN PUBLIC?
“They didn’t name Kirk Douglass directly to avoid a lawsuit...”
People who are telling the truth don’t worry about being sued for slander.