Posted on 02/05/2020 4:56:01 PM PST by From The Deer Stand
In July 2016 then FBI director James Comey noted that Hillary Clinton did break the law while using a private computer server but he wasn't going to charge her with a crime because she didn't "intend" to do so. Using the same logic in the impeachment fiasco, Trump could have simply cited the prior ruling of Comey by saying that "if" a law was broken he didn't "intend" to do so. Case closed
National Socialist NANZI “didn’t mean to break the law” while destroying government documents she was entrusted with.
Why? The President was acquitted
BUT The Hillary treason thing isnt a ‘done deal’ quite yet.
So we can’t have Trump using such a ludicrous thing like the Dems expect they get use of.
CONSPIRACY TO COVERUP TREASOM IS TREASON
Hillary losing to Trump leaves open that ... Wasnt then ‘swept under the rug’, never to be seen again, as it would have been if madame hillary had gotten elected (at least until the revolution against her tyranny would have happened.)
Applies to A whole lot of Dems including Obama.
.
Comey/Hillary defense...REALLY? Trump doesn’t have to.
He tells the truth.
Sorry that defense only works for Democrats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.