Posted on 01/30/2020 11:23:09 AM PST by Eddie01
Edited on 01/30/2020 12:05:03 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]
...the impeachment is so bad, they are so desperate, in fact anything and I mean ANYTHING would do.
#33
And since it was not in an evidence bag somewhere is useless.
I thought that the dems had all of the bimbos lined up to accuse President Trump’s next as yet unnamed Supreme Court nominee. So it looks like they have some to spare.
Never any chain of custody on this alleged DNA. DISMISSED.
This crazy b*tch who thinks rape is s*xy can go to h*ll.
Nice try, you crazy b*tch!!! Did the Vile Botoxian put you up to this? I’ll bet she did!
Maybe it was the other way around? A guy with millions doesn’t need to rape anyone unless he is totally butt ugly. I don’t think Trump ever ran out of volunteers. just another case of follow the $$$$$$!
Nutcase. I thought this was pretty much determined.
Yes, that’s it. She’s not playing with a full deck.
She disappeared from the media fairly quickly after that. I can’t believe the media want to push her story again.
That must be a hell of an attractive coat for four guys to have sex with it.
Don’t miss #33
We’re talkin’ bunny in the pot
Not only is it a mix of 4 people, but they actually had some idea of who they were, and tested those people, and they didn’t match.
Which means not only were there at least 4 others, but there were also MORE that she had had sex with in that dress, that they had tested and were NOT found on the dress.
Now, how does semen from a rape get on the sleeve of a dress?
THe story is that he raped her by pulling up the dress, and she eventually “fought him off”.
So maybe she was fighting him off? But it was a SHORT SLEEVE dress.
which means the semen is in the facial area, which is more likely to indicate oral sex, or consensual sex with external ejaculation from a lying-down position.
It isn’t impossible for a rape to end up with semen on the short sleeves of a dress, but seems highly unlikely.
Not as unlikely as the idea that at least 5 other semen samples are found there.
Of course, they just said “DNA samples”, so it is possible some of the other DNA is just because someone touched them on the shoulder.
Should’ve said something 30 years ago, dear.
The judge should tell her to have DNA tests run on what she considers the sample she purports to have and once determined to actually be a viable human DNA sample...only THEN will her request even be considered.
Statute Of Limitations???
What the hell is that?
This demented parrot doesn’t know enough to get off the stage,
Even a criminal wearing gloves may unwittingly leave behind trace amounts of biological material. It could be a hair, saliva, blood, semen, skin, sweat, mucus or earwax. All it takes is a few cells to obtain enough DNA information to identify a suspect with near certainty. - howstuffworks.com
Probably hair or sweat or sneeze.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.