Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: southern rock

Not really. The idea of women getting tattoos, more than just a butterfly on the ankle, didn’t really start until the late 90s/early 2000s. Still a while back, but I think the younger ones are already rejecting it.


67 posted on 01/26/2020 7:10:06 PM PST by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: fr_freak
Not really. The idea of women getting tattoos, more than just a butterfly on the ankle, didn’t really start until the late 90s/early 2000s. Still a while back, but I think the younger ones are already rejecting it.

Have to disagree with your timeline. I used to watch Headbangers Ball back in the day so I really feel like I have a front row seat on this one. In 1985 not even most metal and hard rock bands had any tattoos. It’s almost strange to go back and watch some of those old videos now and see rockers NOT inked. However, by 1989, a lot of them had full sleeves, chest and back pieces. And almost all of them had at least several tats if not full arms and backs. I have to say this was the beginning of the modern tattoo era. Definitely influenced me. I got my first one in 1992. My last one in 1999. So yes, the 90s I feel was definitely the heyday. I feel you are correct that it has been in a slight decline ever since but I don’t think it’s going away anytime soon.

And I will admit, if I could just snap my fingers and make all of mine disappear, I probably would. But I can’t. No biggie. I really don’t care that much.

71 posted on 01/26/2020 7:24:04 PM PST by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson