Well, actually there’s nothing at all funny about the subject matter at hand....
But how about the “double entendre” in the third line?
>>But how about the “double entendre” in the third line?
Well, given that I have the Bigg Red problem with language, I’m not the one to comment on that. I’m still trying to figure out why I feel that there should be an extra syllable in the last line when the pattern says there shouldn’t.
dah DAH dah dah DAH dah dah DAH dah
There is a young Biden named Humper.
dah DAH dah dah DAH dah dah DAH dah
That dead-brother’s-widow, bones jumper.
dah dah DAH dah dah DAH
His career as a-hole,
dah DAH dah dah DAH
is circling the bowl,
(better would have been It is circling)
dah DAH dah dah DAH dah dah DAH dah
and rapidly goes down the dumper.