Indeed. The quintessential "feminist" these days is a professional victim, putting herself at the mercy of others (who often are bogeymen created uniquely within her imagination). The famous image of a young woman howling because Donald Trump won the presidential election exquisitely embodies the modern "feminist." It is difficult to consider the utterances and behaviors of devout "feminists" and conclude that it was a good idea to give women the right to vote. On the contrary, one might conclude that some kind of IQ test prior to granting the right to vote would be appropriate.
“Why aren’t girls forced to grow up?”
Maybe most of them can’t. Women have what they need at 16 — curves and fertility, the ability to care for babies and children, the ability to keep a house and emotional manipulation self-preservation skills — their eons-old, natural selection- honed genetic program. Done without need of math, writing or critical thought.
For men, it’s around 27. Hunting tactics, survival methods, shelter construction, battle planning, science, math calculation — such skills take longer to mature.
Our core genetic programs are quite different, and so our roles in living are, too. Arguing against it is like arguing against birds flying. There are few exceptions. IMO.