Assuming the facts are as she says, she should be released.
That, however, assumes that the facts ARE as she says, and that she didn’t attack the guy for some other reason, and then claim that the reason was because he was licking her daughter, which is always a possibility.
Yep.
Too many people assume that a man is guilty when he’s accused of a sex crime.
Agreed. Opinions on this short and short on detail article should begin with the phrase “assuming the facts are accurate”.
I have a psychopathic female extended relative with a two year old who would set up something like this with absolutely no compunctions if she wanted to stick it to a man. Where did she learn to do something like this? From her mother who would hit herself in the face and then call the police and say her husband did it.