They should have had a better case, this one sucks. Based on what Q said, I guess impeachment is part of the plan. Not only does otherwise unobtainable evidence (outside of a military tribunal) become available (to Senate Intel committee) as a bonus, it could be used to implicate some of the sitting members of that committee. In the right judicial environment, that evidence would be tantamount to confessions by the accused. Phone calls (voice) texts/emails etc.
Members, 116th Congress
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/about/committee-members-116th-congress-2019-2020
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Only if their actual objective were removal of the President ... something not even AOC could possibly believe will happen.
But logic means nothing to communists, as indicated by their wildly insane policies such as the "Green New Deal," open borders and turning major cities into open latrines where crooks are given all respect and police are vilified.
IN A NUTSHELL: If the House of Representatives continues completely rogue, perhaps continues to add fictitious charges to faux impeachments and batter the Senate with them, THEN HOW ARE THEY TO BE STOPPED?
They may have found a way to get the Constitutional process to shake itself to pieces ... and thus we win every battle but lose the war.
I am certainly no Constitutional scholar (thus pinging Defiant), but as I understand it the power of the SCOTUS was partly self-created, in Marbury v. Madison. Stepping out beyond these boundaries would be problematical for SCOTUS especially at this extremely divided point in our history.
I am worried about the potential that the RATs wish to deliberately provoke a destructive Constitutional crisis which will leave America weaker as a nation; and, that the merits or lack thereof of their insane impeachment efforts may have little bearing on the outcome.