Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bull Snipe
A claim made by someone not there.

But someone considered an expert for his era.

Porter’s ships were within the range of the big guns at Fort Fischer. His ships pound the Fort to rubble.

58 ships? I think that's more of a reasonable force than five, don't you think?

As I said, five ships make it seem like they had no intention of really doing what they claimed they were going to do.

1,621 posted on 02/11/2020 2:33:22 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no oither sovereignty."/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1620 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

What was the experience of the gun crews at Charleston.
Could they hit a ship doing 7 or 8 knots. The gunners at Fort Fisher couldn’t do that with 58 targets.


1,622 posted on 02/11/2020 4:26:07 PM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1621 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp

What was the experience of the gun crews at Charleston.
Could they hit a ship doing 7 or 8 knots. The gunners at Fort Fisher couldn’t do that with 58 targets.


1,623 posted on 02/11/2020 4:29:50 PM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1621 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp

“But someone considered an expert for his era.”

No he wasn’t at the time. He wasn’t even eligible for command of a ship in the Navy at the time. His political dealings with Seward was the only reason Porter got command of a ship.


1,624 posted on 02/11/2020 4:32:52 PM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1621 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson