[MomwithHope]

"The definition of impeachment I think we can agree as follows - a formal accusation of wrongdoing. I believe what the real question in everyone’s mind is the definition of “formal”. "

To me formal means evidence of a specific crime. For Clinton it was PERJURY. They should have just stuck with one article - "orange man bad" . That's what their 2 bogus articles boil down to.

[StormFlag]

LOVE that he said it in an interview...

AG Barr: Soros-funded Dem prosecutor candidates will lead to increased crime, fewer police officers

"There's this recent development [where] George Soros has been coming in, in largely Democratic primaries where there has not been much voter turnout and putting in a lot of money to elect people who are not very supportive of law enforcement and don't view the office as bringing to trial and prosecuting criminals but pursuing other social agendas," Barr told Martha MacCallum.

"They have started to win in a number of cities and they have, in my view, not given the proper support to the police."

... "We could find ourselves in a position that communities that are not supporting the police may not get the police protection they need."

[numberonepal]

To me formal means evidence of a specific crime.

This is my argument. I posted the following to xone:

So you’re saying that the requirement of a “formal accusation” has been met. Fair enough, but I believe there is a strong argument that Article 2 Section 4 has not been met.