Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: xone

So you’re saying that the requirement of a “formal accusation” has been met. Fair enough, but I believe there is a strong argument that Article 2 Section 4 has not been met.


1,006 posted on 12/21/2019 7:56:37 AM PST by numberonepal (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 843 | View Replies ]


To: numberonepal
Fair enough, but I believe there is a strong argument that Article 2 Section 4 has not been met.

Perhaps, but functionally it is over. They have the bloody shirt of 'impeachment' to wave when the SCOTUS vacancy occurs. There are plenty who think the President has to move out of the WH based on that vote. Civics ignorance.

1,010 posted on 12/21/2019 8:03:59 AM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1006 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson