Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bgill

No security, no chain of custody, no verification of validity, any same person would say “yeah, no. They don’t get counted.”


4 posted on 12/18/2019 8:32:00 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Darksheare

This always baffles me about election recounts. It seems that often someone discovers a box of ballots that were never counted in the first place.

If it were up to me, election ballots would be handled the way we handle money in retailing. In retailing cash drawers are counted and if money is missing, someone is held accountable. It seems to me something similar should happen with the election ballots. If a certain Precinct has not turned in their ballots on election day, then, someone is going to be in trouble.

This business of suddenly finding ballots that were not counted is just too too convenient for the Democrats. Whenever these events happen, the resulting additional votes almost always seem to benefit the Democrat candidate or the Democrats side of an issue.


15 posted on 12/18/2019 8:38:31 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Darksheare

Exactly. The chain of custody should have ensured that the votes were counted. It’s insane to consider including votes well after the fact. It’s obvious that somebody could just manufacture enough votes once knowing how far behind they are.


51 posted on 12/18/2019 10:05:57 AM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson