Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bull Snipe
If this were true, General Lee would not have won a battle.

It is generally true. Lee gave the Confederates leverage they would not otherwise had, and he and a few others made their smaller forces more effective than the larger forces which opposed them.

Even so, had the North simply pressed it's manpower advantage, they would have likely lost fewer men on both sides and attained victory much faster.

57 posted on 12/17/2019 11:46:15 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no oither sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

a manpower advantage is little use unless in the hands of a capable leader. The battle of Antietam is a very good example. The Army of the Potomac had almost a 50,000 man advantage in strength. McClellan managed to eke out a drawn battle, even with that advantage. Had someone like Grant or Thomas commanded the Army of the Potomac at the time, I could see the outcome to be very different.
Sheer numbers of soldiers do not win battles. The must be properly lead and equipped to be effective.


60 posted on 12/17/2019 12:39:38 PM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson