Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wbarmy

There were no bridges. Lee fought with his back to the river. Packhorse/Boteler’s Ford was the only way out. McClellan was clearly paralyzed by the weight of decision. He might have made an admirable chief of staff but was temperamentally unsuited to command. His chronic tendency to credit Lee with vastly exaggerated numbers is the iconic symptom. At Antietam, he was also hyper-sensitive to a theoretical threat to his open left flank. After the Seven Days and Second Manassas campaigns, one can understand the sensitivity; leave a flank open and Lee would find it with half his army. But McClellan lost all perspective.


7 posted on 12/12/2019 10:13:02 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: sphinx

My mistake. I hadn’t thought about this particular battle since I wrote a paper on it back in 1993. But I have always been totally fascinated in the possible change in US history if McClellan had been more bold.


12 posted on 12/12/2019 10:34:18 AM PST by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson