I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and answer your question.
Q has stated that he is dealing in information that is classified. He can't come right out with it. That would break various and sundry laws. He has to be coy. The other part is to provide disinformation to the enemy. (If you don't see the deep state and the media as an enemy I can't help you)
this is a fight to wake up the American people to the level of threat to their freedom and their children's freedom.
The threat is real. It is evil in nature. Think demonic/satanic.
That is neither hyperbole nor metaphor. We face an enemy that is blinding the minds of people to the truth.
Truth seekers do not need to be spoon fed. Be not conformed to this world but be transformed by the daily renewing of your mind.
So in sum there is nothing— no citations— you have to share to back the supposition that MOS means MOSSAD.
You and certain others here are asking me to believe an unfounded supposition, because you believe it and repeat it over and over again.
Is that as weak of an argument as it gets?