[bagster]

I was responding to this statement by you.

if Q intends to convey the idea that MOSSAD controls the MSM, he or she should just clearly state “MOSSAD controls the MSM.” IMHO there is no need to be coy about it.)

It shows a great deal of ignorance as to the Q method if information sharing.

Because Q doesn't 'clearly state' things to you just means you don't understand his 'comms'.

So I ask again. Where have you been for the past two years if you don't understand this fundamental and basic thing about my 'cult'.

Or are you being purposefully ignorant?

Also, you seem to be taking this MOSSAD thing kinda personally. Why is that?

[SteveH]

A question for you—

If MOSSAD controls the MSM is self evident, then why must Q be so coy about it? And of what value is it to anyone at all to proclaim it, much less in a manner that requires some secret decoder ring that only the cult faithful can recall, from endless online discussions of unverified surmises and no citations?

[SteveH]

> Also, you seem to be taking this MOSSAD thing kinda personally. Why is that?

Actually I am not, but since you asked, I am responding to comments such as your #809

http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3798879/replies?c=809#809

which contains such impersonal statements out of the blue such as

“You can’t wrap your head around elements of the MOSSAD being a derp state op (like the CIA) and B, you can’t wrap your head around MKUltra still being a thing. “

“Is there anything else you ‘can’t wrap your head around’?”

“#InfectedThinking”

I had not addressed you at all, not to mention in this rude manner. Where before #809 had I ever addressed you in a personal —and rude— manner?

And I am still waiting patiently for citations, which you have failed to provide.