Q Anon: 12/06/19 Trust Trump’s Plan ~ Vol.196, Q Day 770

qmap.pub ^ | 12/6/19 | FReepers, vanity

[SteveH]

> Also, you seem to be taking this MOSSAD thing kinda personally. Why is that?

Actually I am not, but since you asked, I am responding to comments such as your #809

http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3798879/replies?c=809#809

which contains such impersonal statements out of the blue such as

“You can’t wrap your head around elements of the MOSSAD being a derp state op (like the CIA) and B, you can’t wrap your head around MKUltra still being a thing. “

“Is there anything else you ‘can’t wrap your head around’?”

“#InfectedThinking”

I had not addressed you at all, not to mention in this rude manner. Where before #809 had I ever addressed you in a personal —and rude— manner?

And I am still waiting patiently for citations, which you have failed to provide.

[SteveH]

So in sum there is nothing— no citations— you have to share to back the supposition that MOS means MOSSAD.

You and certain others here are asking me to believe an unfounded supposition, because you believe it and repeat it over and over again.

Is that as weak of an argument as it gets?

[SteveH]

welcome to fr!

[little jeremiah]

What has happened in the Isreali elections/PM situation? I haven’t seen any news lately.

[bagster]

If MOSSAD controls the MSM is self evident...

Where do you get the idea that it's 'self evident'?

If things were 'self evident' we wouldn't need a Q to point them out to us.

The trick to this cult is that the people (including you) are being pointed in the right direction and looking and thinking for ourselves. And 'connecting dots' using our superior cult brains.

'Unverified surmises', you say?

Au contraire, mon frere. Since the Qanon program is a White House sponsored information sharing 'official leak' machine and psyop, then the fact that 'Q' says a thing is verification.

Or did you need CNN to confirm?

Do you think Q is a LARP or something?

[Steven W.]

HUSSEIN NOW IN VIETNAM

[SteveH]

you are welcome to believe whatever you want to, but unsupported notions based on cult think which in turn is based on guesses as to what an anonymous source actually means while speaking in code is thin gruel on which to base anything meaningful. no sale.

[bagster]

I had not addressed you at all, not to mention in this rude manner. Where before #809 had I ever addressed you in a personal —and rude— manner?

Yea, but you stepped into my cult chamber and disturbed my chants with your infected thinking.

You have a very low threshold for 'rude', sensitive boy. Cowboy up, ffs.

Now go away. We're about to call the spirit of Q.

Eeny meeny, chile beany, the spirits are about speak.

#WhatNoManCanSeeNorWomanSpeak

#TheCultOfQ

BOO!!!

[fatima]

Live on for awhile Troll.

[little jeremiah]

He has officially outed himself as a purposeful thread distruptor.

[greeneyes]

#ShunningTime.

[bagster]

You and certain others here are asking me to believe an unfounded supposition

Nobody's asking you to believe anything.

You believe what you want.

You believe MOSSAD is clean as a whistle and woudtn't never do nothing wrong.

[SteveH]

i’ll make up my own mind and do what i want. i do not need your permission for anything.

i certainly do not need to subscribe to your methodology of thinking and your belief system. apparently you read a lot into Q that is not there. and apparently you get upset when others interpret Q differently than you do. apparently you conflate your own beliefs with Q such that you cannot tell where Q ends and your interpretation begins. apparently it makes you uncomfortable that someone calls you on it when you try to rattle his cage. also you can’t provide any citations for your suppositions despite being repeatedly and politely asked. that all makes you feel upset and frustrated and perhaps embarrassed. what to do? project your failings on others and then attack them. a more honest response would be that you are out of ammo. tch, tch.

[SteveH]

> You believe MOSSAD is clean as a whistle and woudtn’t never do nothing wrong.

When did I ever make that statement or anything close to it?

citation(s) please— or retract (thank you).

beyond rude now.

sheesh.

[little jeremiah]

Absolutely.

[fatima]

What is your main question?You seem ticked off.

[bagster]

I see you lose your ability to paragraph when you get mad.

[bagster]

citation(s) please— or retract (thank you).

There will be no retractions, sir.

[Disestablishmentarian]

I lean towards the SteveH interpretation of MOS at the pinnacle of the media org.

In part this is because I have long been very interested in the methods of control of organizations and ultimately society at large through control of the information technology infrastructure, and SteveH’s theory fits right in with this point of view.

Besides, it is simply too simplistic for me to see MOS and C_A as identical, and the excessive CIA influence is extremely obvious as indicated by the suppression of JFK questioning and several other ABSOLUTE TABOO “conspiracies” within the MSM.

Sorry ... I’ve lost track of whether this position makes me a reality denier or a victim of conspiracy-cult-think. Maybe both.

[SteveH]

truth denier. lol.