Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wastedyears

You don’t have to pay “child” support on behalf of pets... at least not yet and not for 18-21 years.


11 posted on 12/05/2019 3:09:30 PM PST by AbolishCSEU (Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: AbolishCSEU

I know a childless couple who battled over their dog in divorce court. The judge divided custody. The dog traded homes every other week.


43 posted on 12/05/2019 3:45:30 PM PST by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: AbolishCSEU

More importantly, pets involve a much shorter commitment than children; “pet parents” usually have much more turnover due to the shorter lifespans, so they have numerous opportunities to opt out (unlike the lifelong commitment to children, grandchildren, etc.).


116 posted on 12/06/2019 2:59:36 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson