Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Retain Mike

With airfields all around and everything within shooting distance, there is no reason for a CBG to be there. Maybe cruise into the Arabian sea occasionally for ops, but certainly not the Gulf. Especially the Strait of Hormuz.

Of course it’s an effective triple-dog-dare, spectacular even.

The entire gulf can be protected with shore based air power, 2 diesel boats, 6 corvettes and 4 frigates.

And if every tanker cannot be protected every hour, it’s adequate deterrent.


6 posted on 12/03/2019 11:04:19 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mariner

That’s what I think our Navy should be doing these days. Simply protecting US-flagged commercial and merchant vessels. If other countries and companies want our protection, a nominal fee would suffice.

We just spend too damn much.


7 posted on 12/03/2019 11:14:40 AM PST by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

It’s really an absurd place to put a CVN, whose natural home is open ocean.


9 posted on 12/03/2019 11:34:04 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

that sounds fine to me. I would suggest that Trump could ask the European NATO countries to start pulling their weight by sending their warships to the gulf. The kids would love it and it would be great training.


13 posted on 12/03/2019 12:00:43 PM PST by Retain Mike ( Sat Cong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson