Publik skool made me smart.
Seems you were saying the enabling rule applied to citizens and the agency, when it reads clearly that this rule applies to the agency. It applies to the agency, an agency that should be limited by the constitution. It is not a rule that is aimed at limiting citizen rights.
If you disagree, I was wondering why you didn’t raise your objection or concerns to the Agency when it was out for public comment. I did, called people I know in DOJ and asked them a few questions. It’s an awful rule and I told them that.
I may be smart (being educated in public schools), I saw no snark aimed at you. That confuses. Just because someone has a different opinion does not mean they are your enemy and should be a target of your snark.
Cheers!
FRiend, I wasn’t trying to piss you off.
I simply didn’t say any such thing.
My initial post on the topic stated that the rule could not be reconciled with the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution, and went on to include the text of that amendment.
Anyway, you’re free to believe as you wish about what I mean, or how I intended my replies; after all, I’m just words on a screen.