Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PeteePie

The total meat consumption statistic is off. In the early 1900s, most meat was locally produced. Their statistic comes from meat shipped. That skews the statistics.

“The data from the early 1900s, which is what McGovern and others used, are known to be especially poor. Among other things, these data accounted only for the meat, dairy, and other fresh foods shipped across state lines in those early years, so anything produced and eaten locally, such as meat from a cow or eggs from chickens, would not have been included.

And since farmers made up more than a quarter of all workers during these years, local foods must have amounted to quite a lot....

...The English novelist Anthony Trollope reported, during a trip to the United States in 1861, that Americans ate twice as much beef as did Englishmen. Charles Dickens, when he visited, wrote that “no breakfast was breakfast” without a T-bone steak. Apparently, starting a day on puffed wheat and low-fat milk—our “Breakfast of Champions!”—would not have been considered adequate even for a servant.”

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/06/how-americans-used-to-eat/371895/


32 posted on 11/29/2019 9:38:31 AM PST by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
Apparently, starting a day on puffed wheat and low-fat milk—our “Breakfast of Champions!”—would not have been considered adequate even for a servant.”

LOL, Bruce Jenner ate Wheaties, look what happened....


37 posted on 11/29/2019 9:40:10 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson