To: BenLurkin
During the underwater test, they were able to measure a broad range of frequencies of seismic waves from a magnitude 3.4 earthquake that occurred 45 kilometers inland near Gilroy, California, and map multiple known and previously unmapped submarine fault zones, part of the San Gregorio Fault system. They also were able to detect steady-state ocean wavesso-called ocean microseismsas well as storm waves, all of which matched buoy and land seismic measurements. I wonder how well this system would work to detect passage of submarines, and whether that's the real purpose of the research?
2 posted on
11/29/2019 6:09:30 AM PST by
PapaBear3625
("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
To: PapaBear3625
3 posted on
11/29/2019 6:21:57 AM PST by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
To: PapaBear3625
I’ve always wondered why submarines have never cut these cables?
It would certainly be a nightmare to splice the cables back to re-establish connection.
4 posted on
11/29/2019 6:23:52 AM PST by
newfreep
("INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT" - DAVID HOROWITZ)
To: PapaBear3625
Seems very likely. Theres big money in that sort of research. I saw it with underwater acoustics many years ago.
6 posted on
11/29/2019 6:38:10 AM PST by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: PapaBear3625
Theoretically, any change in pressure should effect the strain on the fiber optic cable. The difficult part is detecting the very small signals over background noise and pinpointing its location within a worthwhile accuracy.
11 posted on
11/29/2019 7:28:45 AM PST by
2001convSVT
(Medicare for All = Medical Care for None!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson