[philman_36]

Perhaps the logs were from dedicated perimeter monitoring devices?

Why would the Cyber Crime unit/FBI even need that if they had the images? The logs would be resident on them.
The only logical answer is that CrowdStrike gave them the copies since their forensic analysis is the ONLY stated forensic analysis to have been conducted.

Either way, does the fact that we haven't seen everything mean the FBI is lying when they say they got enough to confirm CrowdStrike's analysis?

That isn't the issue. The issue is the claim that the FBI did a forensic analysis when it can't be shown that they did in fact carry out their own independent forensic analysis.

[philman_36]

Use your Find/Search function with "cybersecurity firm".

Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election

Everything about the DNC "hacking" is based upon that cybersecurity firm's reporting.

¹⁹ Bears in the Midst: Intrusion into the Democratic National Committee, CrowdStrike (June 15,2016) (post originally appearing on June 14, 2016, according to records of the timing provided by CrowdStrike); Ellen Nakashima, Russian government hackers penetrated DNC, stole opposition research on Trump, Washington Post (June 14, 2016).Bears in the Midst: Intrusion into the Democratic National Committee

Russian government hackers penetrated DNC, stole opposition research on Trump