Then where is the report on what was discovered by the FBI? There is always paperwork.
Why did the FBI need to get copies of the logs if they had imaged drives of the servers?
You've just perfectly made my point.
You're avoiding my points.
I don't know if those reports have been released or not - I haven't looked for them.
As to the logs, I don't know that either but it may be a function of the security architecture employed. Perhaps the logs were from dedicated perimeter monitoring devices?
Either way, does the fact that we haven't seen everything mean the FBI is lying when they say they got enough to confirm CrowdStrike's analysis?