Replies

Read replies 42 through 45 and let me know if you still believe the BS you're spooning out after you read them.

There's absolutely nothing in those replies to say Crowdstrike didn't share all of their data, including system and disk images, with the FBI.

Even the Mueller report says they shared the images and traffic logs with the FBI.

You give away the game with this:

Pardon my skepticism if I don't believe the DNC turned over SQUAT to the FBI.

The FBI and the DNC both say the FBI got everything they wanted, but you're so committed to some conspiracy theory you can't accept direct testimony.

Even the Mueller report says they shared the images and traffic logs with the FBI.

You mean Page 40, Footnote 135?

The GRU also stole documents from the DNC network shortly after gaining access. On April 22, 2016, the GRU copied files fromthe DNC network to GRU-controlled computers. Stolen documents included the DNC’s opposition research into candidate Trump.¹³⁴ Between approximately May 25, 2016 and June 1, 2016, GRU officers accessed the DNC’s mail server from a GRU-controlled computer leased inside the United States.¹³⁵ During these connections, Unit 26165 officers appear to have stolen thousands of emails and attachments, which were later released by WikiLeaks in July 2016.¹³⁶

¹³⁵ ("Redacted" Investigative Technique) See SM-2589105-GJ, serial 649. As part of its investigation, the FBI later received images of DNC servers and copies of relevant traffic logs. Netyksho Indictment ¶¶ 28-29.

What's that? If the FBI has the images of the DNC servers why did they get copies of the traffic logs? Who gave them the copies?

Netyksho Indictment

Where is the report from the FBI Cyber Crime division detailing the information they got from the servers?

What? You say there isn't a Cyber Crime Division report?
Funny, that.

Until a report comes out I consider Footnote 135 as just one more lie among many. You can take it as gospel truth, but I'm not that gullible.

The FBI and the DNC both say the FBI got everything they wanted, but you're so committed to some conspiracy theory you can't accept direct testimony.

Odd that you make such a claim when I gave a link and the words of direct testimony in reply 43...

Full text: James Comey testimony transcript on Trump and Russia COMEY: In the case of the DNC, and I believe the D triple C, but I'm sure the DNC, we did not have access to the devices themselves. We got relevant forensic information from a private party, a high class entity, that had done the work but we didn't get direct access.
BURR: But no content.
COMEY: Correct.
BURR: Isn't content an important part of the forensics from a counter-intelligence standpoint?
COMEY: It is but what was briefed to me by the people who were my folks at the time is that they had gotten the information from the private party that they needed to understand the intrusion by the spring of 2016. The Mueller report isn't direct testimony, but you know that.