I don’t think the issue is the exact legal definition. It’s more the cost of a lawyer if someone sues you, even if they’re wrong. The goal seems to be to avoid lawsuits and to encourage self policing, which often is policing by those who are bothered by something or someone and find this a pleasant way to pass their time. Those items not policed, simply slip thru. Might cost more to install real policing, than to hire a lawyer for the occasional lawsuit when you can show you’re trying to cut back copyright infringement.
+!
(why r we both up?) :)
nite
I don’t think the issue is the exact legal definition. It’s more the cost of a lawyer if someone sues you, even if they’re wrong. The goal seems to be to avoid lawsuits and to encourage self policing, which often is policing by those who are bothered by something or someone and find this a pleasant way to pass their time. Those items not policed, simply slip thru. Might cost more to install real policing, than to hire a lawyer for the occasional lawsuit when you can show you’re trying to cut back copyright infringement.@@@@
Remember the new rules of the left:
1. If you cant beat them, sue them until they are bankrupt!
2. Sue them until they shut up!
Palin, Flynn, Stone, etc....
We must be patient and trust the plan. Only the US gov has the juice to stand against Soros type $$ when going to court.
WWG1WGA!