But you gotta concentrate on one thing. If you keep talking about climate change it will detract from the cause of more money for slaveowners - an area in which your activities could actually make a difference.
I just ran across this item yesterday, and it is an idea I had never previously contemplated. If you have the wherewithal to pause for a moment and think from the perspective of your hated Southerners, does this explanation not sound plausible to you?
Excerpt:
"When the Southern states seceded, they were concerned to do so legally or constitutionally under the Constitution so that the North could not legally claim that it was an act of rebellion and invade the Southern states. To make this case, the South needed to make a case that the North had broken the Constitutional contract and that the South was seceding because the North had not kept to the Constitution.This presented a legal challenge for the South, because the reason for which the Southern states were seceding was the tariff, but the Constitution gave the federal government the right to levy a tariff. Therefore, the Southern states could not cite the tariff as a breach of the Constitutional fabric."
Here is the whole article.
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2018/11/14/a-civil-war-lesson-for-the-uneducated/
I find the argument plausible and compelling, and I plan to keep it in the back of my mind for future discussions in this vein.