Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

Couldn’t possibly be that no one wants to pay to see a warmed-over, big screen rehashing of a mediocre ‘70s tv show.


8 posted on 11/18/2019 6:53:29 PM PST by LIConFem (I will no longer accept the things I cannot change. it's time to change the things I cannot accept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LIConFem

Charlies angels is sexist at its core. One guy ordering around 3 hot babes. Surprised anyone even still tries to make a movie around such a horrible un-pc premise.

You know its fantasy because in the original series the women had respect for the guy and actually did what he told them to do.


18 posted on 11/18/2019 7:01:35 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: LIConFem
The original Charlies show had about an 80% male viewership and guys had entire rooms wall papered with Angels posters

Young guys are the target demographic for the Charlies Angels franchise.

So of course it makes total sense to recast the show as a modern feminist parable on bashing men

And these gals are so woke they cant figure this out?

106 posted on 11/18/2019 10:27:26 PM PST by rdcbn ( Referentia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: LIConFem

Not to mention a cast completely devoid of any star power. Kristen Stewart is not, never was, and certainly never will be a box office draw.


115 posted on 11/19/2019 2:36:48 AM PST by Atticus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson