That is what she said. "I am and remain a huge sceptic, even after this happened. I’ve thought of every possible explanation and I still have no idea how this happened. Whether you choose to believe me or not, I have no reason to make this up and like I said, I’m skeptical every time I hear a story like this. But nonetheless, here is the completely unexplainable event I witnessed."
But if you define skeptic as one who must deny any supernatural explanation, then that would be better defined as being an anti-deist.
I think he was trying to make a big deal over the misspelling of “skeptic” as “sceptic” - even though the author correctly spelled “skeptical” a few sentences later.