Posted on 11/01/2019 11:58:31 AM PDT by ransomnote
She said it was a moment of frustration and that the story at the time didn't meet the standards to put on the air. ABC said the story didn't meet their standards.
Funny how all those stories against Kavanaugh must have met their standards because they were published without any hesitation.
you’d better self report this link - not even links allowed to bloomberg -
I found this out the hard way...
Met her and had communication with her about Alan Keyes appearance, communication also on FR for awhile.
We have been under sustained attacks the past few days and doing everything we can to get things stable again. The site is still online - albeit limping along - as we reorganize and restructure to deflect attacks coming from many angles.— Ron (@CodeMonkeyZ) November 5, 2019
Things are happening.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, November 4, 2019
California Woman Sentenced to Prison for Aiding and Abetting Production of Child Pornography
A Madera County, California, woman was sentenced today to 200 months in prison, followed by 180 months of supervised release, for aiding and abetting the production of child pornography, announced Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Departments Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney McGregor W. Scott of the Eastern District of California.
Ashley Maddox, 32, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Dale A. Drozd of the Eastern District of California. According to admissions made in connection with her guilty plea on May 24, 2019, the defendant came to the attention of law enforcement in Fort Pierce, Florida, in the course of their investigation into an offender there. The investigation revealed that beginning in or about November 2015, Maddox had communicated with that offender, via the internet and mobile-based applications, about their mutual sexual interest in minors. A forensic examination of that individuals cellular phone recovered Kik chat conversations between them. Over the course of these communications, Maddox requested that this individual send her images and video recordings in which he sexually abused a minor victim in his care. To encourage this individual to produce such images, Maddox requested that he commit specific acts, and indicated that the images she had received from him had aroused her. Maddox also sent him sexually explicit images of a minor to whom she had access.
The investigation was conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcements Homeland Security Investigations in Fort Pierce, Florida, and Fresno, California. Trial Attorney Nadia C. Prinz of the Criminal Divisions Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS) and Assistant U.S. Attorney David L. Gappa of the Eastern District of California prosecuted the case.
This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by U.S. Attorneys Offices and CEOS, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit
www.justice.gov/psc.
The only standards at ABC being; it hurts conservatives.
If only Ditka...
__________________________________________________
BINGO!
“yeah that’s the ticket”
Their statements don’t match the video:
“What we had was unreal. Other women backing it up...”
“we convinced her to come out...it was unbelievable what we had. We had Clinton, we had everything.”
And there is the reason...
Seems like they have ‘selective’ standards depending on who is being exposed.
Longer version of the ABC tape with analysis by Crower.
Please remove my post 1493. Sorry.
Funny how all those stories against Kavanaugh must have met their standards because they were published without any hesitation.
********************************************
Exactly.
Could Coates be the anonymous writer?!?
This thread is now retired. Thank you to all who posted and lurked. Click on the image to join us on the new thread.
Excellent point! How asinine are these cya statements?
George M Nasif
@GeorgeMNasif
https://mobile.twitter.com/georgemnasif/status/1191580211667595266?s=21
How much did John Kerry and Obama have to do with the Coup in Ukraine? ohhh about half a Billion worth.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Soros $, and Victoria Nuland was involved as well. The whole Euro-Maidan “protests” were not organic at all. People were bussed in and paid. Pravi Sektor, the paramilitary arm of the Svoboda party, were also involved. They are hardcord neo Nazis and didn’t hide it at all. There was an incredible live thread about that at the time here on FR and caww did incredible work on it.
I hadn’t seen/heard the whole thing.
This IS huge!
From Mr. Webster
Excerpt
WORD OF THE DAY
louche
adjective
;lüsh
\
Definition of louche
: not reputable or decent
Synonyms & Antonyms for louche
Synonyms
discreditable, disgraceful, dishonorable, disreputable, ignominious, infamous, notorious, opprobrious, shady, shameful, shoddy, shy, unrespectable
Antonyms
honorable, reputable, respectable
Louche ultimately comes from the Latin word luscus, meaning “blind in one eye or “having poor sight.” This Latin term gave rise to the French louche, meaning “squinting” or “cross-eyed.” The French gave their term a figurative sense as well, taking that squinty look to mean “shady” or “devious.” English speakers didn’t see the need for the sight-impaired uses when they borrowed the term in the 19th century, but they kept the figurative one. The word is still quite visible today and is used to describe both people and places of questionable repute.
Examples of louche in a Sentence
before gentrification, it was the sort of louche neighborhood where people went looking for illegal drugs
First Known Use of louche
1819, in the meaning defined above
History and Etymology for louche
French, literally, cross-eyed, squint-eyed, from Latin luscus blind in one eye
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So someone on twitter said that “looshing” was one way how the deep state parasitic pirates generate, direct and collect our energy (they feed off of us) or our negativity.
I know its “out there” but if one thinks of movies, music, programming, FAKE NEWS, etc., that appears to be exactly what they are doing. Stimulating us to anger, sadness and insanity and somehow feeding off that negativity.
FOOD for THOUGHT!
I will LOOK further into it!
The ONE-EYE symbolism is intriguing especially with all the Covered-Eye Monarch and Black-eye symbolism photos we have been subjected to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.