Ok. So the police pull over a suspect in a shooting that led to a fatality, and after initially complying with the police, the known juvenile thug takes off running and scales the fence to a day care center where kids are. Justified shoot because the police had a probable fear that said juvenile thug could harm the kids at the day care. Or would you have liked for the police not to have shot, and potentially ended up with innocent kids being harmed/killed by a known thug because the police failed to act.
In my book, and apparently the inquiry’s outcome, it was a justified shoot. It just had the additional benefit of ensuring no more crimes were committed by the thug in the future.
Police had already detained him
He was unarmed
The cop took a head shot at an unarmed 16 year old suspected of a gang killing
Ok with you right .
Actually, the day care was not open. Which is good because “ the investigation determined the trajectory of the bullet led to the day-care window, Chandler said, which could have posed a danger if children had been present.”.