Nucatola also described how she was upset about the release of the videos, and again sobbed when relating how she and her family were “damaged” by them.
That moment may have provided a turning point for the defense.
Upon cross examination one pro-life attorney questioned Nucatola about the damages caused by the video. Then he brought up statements she had made under oath during an earlier deposition.
In deposition, Nucatola said that the release of the videos was “no big deal” that “did not damage me.”
In addition, she had made sworn statements such as, “I did nothing wrong.” “I don’t care if these videos are released.” “There is nothing wrong with what I said.”
This completely impeached Nucatola’s testimony and destroyed her credibility.
IOW, she lied under oath? Wow, what a surprise, coming from an organization that does what it does and laughs about it, then doesn't want the video shown. Thanks Morgana.
If her testimony was impeached on cross via a prior deposition, why did the Judge all of a sudden allow the playing of the video ?
I wonder if somewhere down the road this is a reversible error
Thanks for pinging this out. This trial is bogus and so glad PP is being exposed in the process.