Yes, “sources” say. Trembling, nervous, weak kneed sources who have never heard angry voices before, never seen a contentious meeting before, never watched a speaker trying to become president by treasonous means before, never heard the righteous anger of a targeted president’s response before.....
Welcome to our Banana Republic of America. At present, Adam Schiff's private impeachment posse is holding secret trials that other congress persons cannot attend and he refuses to release trial transcripts.
Not to be out done, there's now a deep state push to have the senate hold a secret vote. What's good (coup) for the reps, is good (coup) for the senators, apparently.
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1999/2/5/the-senate-should-vote-in-secret/
"The Constitution makes clear that the Senate may convict an impeached president with the "concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present." But it is silent as to the exact procedure that the Senate should follow at the trial's end to determine whether two-thirds concur.”
Yes this is really being floated in the cesspools of the web (started with Daily Kos, got trapped in the coarse filter at DU). It's a trial balloon out there in the lefty swamps. Apparently, the fantasy is, "He who counts the ballots, rules the presidency." *smh*