Skip to comments.
IG could not explain 18-day window between Ukraine call and whistleblower complaint: sources
Fox News ^
| October 7,2019
| Catherine Herridge, Ronn Blitzer
Posted on 10/07/2019 4:43:28 PM PDT by Jayster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Sources further have told Fox News that Atkinson revealed the whistleblower volunteered he or she was a registered Democrat and had a prior working relationship with a prominent Democratic politician. Attorneys for the whistleblower at the firm Compass Rose did not respond to requests for comment on this work history or on the lack of disclosure about the contact with Schiff's office.
1
posted on
10/07/2019 4:43:28 PM PDT
by
Jayster
To: Jayster
They had to change the rule first
2
posted on
10/07/2019 4:48:08 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
To: Jayster
One Man’s Whistleblower is another Man’s Seditious Spy.
3
posted on
10/07/2019 4:50:00 PM PDT
by
Kickass Conservative
(Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.)
To: Jayster
What “controversial” phone call?
4
posted on
10/07/2019 4:55:03 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: Jayster
There is no whistleblower. Fake.
5
posted on
10/07/2019 4:55:06 PM PDT
by
Hattie
To: Jayster
I don’t particularly care about who the whistle blower is or what he fears.
I’d like his claims and the claims of his informants to be revealed and investigated
6
posted on
10/07/2019 4:55:58 PM PDT
by
cymbeline
To: Jayster
What a complete joke all of this is.
7
posted on
10/07/2019 5:00:01 PM PDT
by
shanover
(...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
To: a fool in paradise
Atkison is deep state through and through. He worked for Mueller and for Obamaroid AND Killery.
8
posted on
10/07/2019 5:01:18 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
To: Jayster
They will slowly leak out the damaging info so by the time there is any public testimony it will be old news.
9
posted on
10/07/2019 5:01:58 PM PDT
by
lodi90
To: Jayster
The whistleblower's attorneys, meanwhile, maintain the whistleblower did not receive assistance from congressional sources in writing the complaint...Did the person get help from their attorneys in writing the complaint?
(Schitt for Brain's staff did recommend the person get an attorney)
If so, did the person's attorneys receive assistance from congressional sources in writing the complaint with their client?
Doing that would make the statement true while not disclosing the actual truth.
SO many questions.
10
posted on
10/07/2019 5:03:05 PM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Jayster
The dems have control of the house, so they can do what ever they want. But to breach Executive Privilege, they are going to need real probable cause and a full vote of the house. At least that is the way I see it with my limited knowledge. Then there is Trumps agenda which is not liked by majorities in both the political branches. I think the dems are thinking that by doing this, Trump has to keep his party happy so they will not vote to remove after impeachment. But Trump’s move today in Syria shows Trump will not play by that. If this is all about the 2020 elections, I think the dems are in trouble. But if the Senate were to vote to remove Trump, the dems would run the table in 2020. The repubs have control here, but they have a history of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
11
posted on
10/07/2019 5:05:00 PM PDT
by
JoSixChip
(I'm an American Nationalist)
To: Jayster
Can he explain why the rule was changed and when?
12
posted on
10/07/2019 5:07:22 PM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
To: Jayster
This is almost an exact copy of the anti Kavanaugh conspiracy.
To: Hattie
There was a whistleblower. The person probably played the skin flute is my guess.
14
posted on
10/07/2019 5:15:15 PM PDT
by
wgmalabama
(Mittens is the new Juan. Go away mittens)
To: Jayster
15
posted on
10/07/2019 5:15:56 PM PDT
by
jonrick46
(Cultural Marxism is the cult of the Left waiting for the Mothership.)
To: Lurkinanloomin
That is need to know, deplorable citizen, and you have no need to know. :-(
16
posted on
10/07/2019 5:16:26 PM PDT
by
cgbg
(Vote Trump or you will _be_ Trump)
To: Jayster
The whistle blower was in on the call? Well, THAT shouldn’t be too hard to figure out.
17
posted on
10/07/2019 5:18:58 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: Jayster
Cause it took Shifty that long to hatch a plot.
To: Hattie
There is no whistleblower. Fake. That's brilliant. Hence the need for the back-up spy.
To: Jayster
Why do they have political hacks working for the CIA?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson