“But the bible is already under the worst attack against it since it was first printed. lets not give them more ammunition.”
Them who?
I only mentioned just his name in relation to the topic of solar events. Hopefully this was not understood as discrediting the Bible in any way form or fashion. It was just a name without any support or mention of his other branch theories at all.
How did you read into it and misconstrue anything other? The name alone was the seed? If so it was you who watered it and caused it to grow into an ugly tree with many ugly branches threatening the veracity of the Bible.
See what I am getting at here? If we had been discussing faith or the bible then your point of view here would make absolute sense and fit the discussion. I am just simply trying to stay on topic without any predetermined prejudices that might distract from it. Especially if it is just because I simply dropped a name. :)
We should absolutely at some point explore your concerns with the side topic though if you like. I have much support for the Biblical record as a historian. :)
The bible is already hard for people to accept. Lets not make it more difficult