John Solomon uncovers a LOT more Biden corruption in Ukraine than was previously known

TNS ^ | 10/7/19 | TNS Staff

[SleeperCatcher]

There are two things reasonable people can agree on these days: Joe and Hunter Biden are corrupt, and The Hill’s John Solomon is an excellent investigative reporter with impeccable instincts and sources.

The latter has uncovered a lot more corruption involving Hunter Biden’s deal with Burisma, a Ukrainian natural gas company that was paying him a lot more a month than the previously reported $50,000. Like more than five times as much.

What’s more, the FBI was aware of the money that was being transferred from the company to accounts held by Hunter Biden.

Oh, and there’s that time in April 2014 when then-VP Joe Biden actually set up the Burisma deal for his son. Yes, he set it up.

[Real Cynic No More]

Ibid!

[Real Cynic No More]

Agree with you. References to this site should be banned from FR. It does more harm than good to the conservative cause.

[cymbeline]

“The use of vulgarity and colloquialisms...”

Totally agree. Trump gets bashed for a little saltiness but the entertainment media (news media falls in that category) is saturated with profanity throw in dishonesty and stupidity.

[philman_36]

The use of vulgarity and colloquialisms does not reflect well on this news site.

Perhaps you should read their "About Us" page...
About

We here at The National Sentinel are not about to sit back and just watch this s*|t unfold while doing nothing to help expose it.
Our method is in-your-face conservatism. Big balls conservatism. ‘*uck you’ conservatism. We don’t have time to be polite anymore. And we’re not going to be.
So if this kind of approach offends your sensibilities, okay. Maybe you shouldn’t be here. We’re not going to change because, again, we don’t have time to be polite to these deep state p*|cks.

You don't have to read the threads or visit the website.

If they want to be taken seriously, and the content may be true, it does not come across as reliable.
What "may be" false in their reporting? It's either true or it isn't.

You put more credit with how something "appears" than how it is.
Got it.
Isnt that the same thing the MSM does?

[1Old Pro]

Was that single NY Times “investigation” the reason that the democrat-media-national press corpse claims these charges against Biden have “totally debunked” so many times?

Yes, laughable how corrupt the media is.

[philman_36]

I wouldn’t waste my time reading their stuff.

But you'll sure as s*|t come on the thread that has their stuff, read the comments therein and then denigrate them, won't you.

[Jimmy The Snake]

But this is a ‘conspiracy theory’ stated by 60 Minutes last nite

[philman_36]

In addition to being offensive, it makes the writer sound juvenile and not worth taking seriously.

See reply 24.
I'm sensing a meme/narrative.

If you don't like it then leave. Nobody forced you onto this thread and nobody is forcing you to read the article
Casting aspersions does you no favors. Find falsehoods in the article...if you can...and critique that.

[CollegeRepublican]

If that is their mission, to be crude and in your face, fine and dandy. But why use vulgarity when you can report without it?

I cuss at times, but not at work. There is a time and place. I would argue that reporting the news is not the time and place. That is all. I was interested in what Solomon had to report and still read the article, but as you can see from other comments in this thread, other people stopped reading.

[philman_36]

...I stopped reading after the first sentence.

I read the whole thing and found it humorous, enlightening and entertaining.

But, then again, I'm a deplorable, low brow blue collar worker who is used to such vulgarities used in everyday conversations. I guess that makes me a Bad American.
"My ears aren't 'virgins'", as it were. I bet yours aren't either.

(please note that while I used such vulgarities myself at work around grown men I don't use those same vulgarities around children and (usually) women. i do use my manners when needed)

Perhaps you should read reply 24 as well.

[Liz]

JOHN SOLOMON:
<><> in April 2014 then-VP Joe Biden set up the Burisma deal for his son.
<><> Obama's intel apparat was aware of Burisma transferring money from company accounts to Hunter Biden accounts.
<><> for public consumption, Burisma reportedly paid Hunter $50,000.......
<><> the actual payout was more than five times as much,
<><> the Burisma payout was split among Obama, Biden, the CIA and the FBI.

“Thanks Hunter-- my bank statement arrived. And Michelle loved the diamond from China you sent over.”

[Harpotoo]

They are interchangeable like stephanosyphlis!

[philman_36]

But why use vulgarity when you can report without it?

Ummm...because they can? Because it's common parlance?

Or is only "polite speech" acceptable now, the First Amendment be damned?

What is the difference between maternal fornicator and mother f*(&er?
Is it simply because one sounds crass and the other doesn't despite them both saying the same thing?

How about dung or manure? Isn't it all still s*|t?

WTF?! (I'm pretty sure you don't need that translated)
(but then again...what the fornication?!)

See what I mean?

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

I totally agree thanks for pointing it out.

[InterceptPoint]

But you'll sure as s*|t come on the thread that has their stuff, read the comments therein and then denigrate them, won't you.

Give me an example. I don't know what you are talking about. I don't read Donna Brazile. I don't read Chris Wallace. But I will continue to comment on what jerks they are. Thank you very much.

[Sergio]

bkmk

[Ann Archy]

Hugh Hewitt said today that Chuck Todd is NOT a DEMOCRAT! LIAR PRESSTITUTE!!

[philman_36]

Give me an example.

Very well...
If they want to be taken seriously, and the content may be true, it does not come across as reliable. +++++
To which you replied...I am witness #1 for your proposition. I wouldn’t waste my time reading their stuff.
You're urging others not to read their material because it's a waste of their time simply because a few 'vulgar' words are used, aren't you?

Or do you simply not recognize what you did?

[InterceptPoint]

Here is what you quoted me saying:

” I wouldn’t waste my time reading their stuff.”.

I didn’t. I don’t.

I’ve seen enough of them in the past to know that the best course is to just totally ignore anything they have to say in print or in video.

And I’m continuing to urge others to do the same. Part of the reason for this is that I see Freepers giving up on decent news sources like Fox News just because they did something stupid like hiring Donna Brazile.

I suggesting they stick with Fox News and ignore Donna Brazile. That’s hardly a crime.

[philman_36]

Well, at least now you aren't denying that you were disparaging towards them.
If anything, you've made it more obvious than it was before.