Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I'm curious if locals have an opinion. Churchill Downs has a reputation to many in the racing industry that outside of Kentucky, the ownership is more interested in real estate and/or casinos. Current examples include their properties in Florida, Illinois and maybe Louisiana and in the past California.

This paragraph is of interest: Churchill’s deal for Turfway was reached just one month in advance of the Kentucky gubernatorial election, which could have a significant impact on the political appetite for casinos in the state. The incumbent, Matt Bevin, a Tea Party Republican, has rejected plans for expanded gambling and continues to campaign against the legalization of casinos, while his opponent, Attorney General Andy Beshear, a Democrat, has said that he would support a casino bill, in part to raise money for the state’s ailing pension funds.

1 posted on 10/03/2019 5:45:53 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeStatement

I’m glad to see it. The track had been allowed to become very run down. The investment promised by its old owner (a casino 10 miles away) for slots was never going to happen. The track has a winter meet with a synthetic track which has been very safe for inclement racing. I wonder if they’ll keep the Polytrack?


2 posted on 10/03/2019 5:59:35 PM PDT by hardspunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson