Posted on 10/02/2019 2:09:39 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
So, the liars are lying about not lying.
Thats a shocker.
“The science of climate change is more than 150 years old and it is probably the most tested area of modern science.”
Bald faced lie right out of the box. Not worth my time
RE: The author has included numerous outright lies.
It would be helpful if you could highlight a few of them that he wrote in the article. Thanks.
Bump for later
Catastrophic Anthropogenic Gorebal Warning Hockey Stick Hoax Denier, denying.
That’s all.
Have fun with this one.
“Eunice Newton Foote rarely gets the credit she’s due. The American scientist, who was born exactly 200 years ago on Wednesday, was the first woman in climate science. It was back in 1856 that Foote theorized that changes in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere could affect the Earth’s temperature. She broke scientific ground that remains more relevant than ever in 2019, but history overlooked her until just a few years ago.
Foote arrived at her breakthrough idea through experimentation. With an air pump, two glass cylinders, and four thermometers, she tested the impact of “carbonic acid gas” (the term for carbon dioxide in her day) against “common air.” When placed in the sun, she found that the cylinder with carbon dioxide trapped more heat and stayed hot longer.”
There is NO “Climate Science” that has yet been developed, much less a 150 year old one.
The Erf’s Climate is pretty tough to test, as in a Lab under controlled conditions.
The author is a PhD. Quack.
bkmk
“probably the most tested area of modern science”
Beyond laughable
How much money has been put into nuclear energy research vice “climate science”?
Gazillions.
Was this written by Adam Schiff or Hilary Clinton, because only a bald face, prolific liar could produce such complete and total bullcrap. Every single one of these is a shameless lie. Every one.
NASA: Climate changes due to shifts in solar orbit, not human activity
https://www.oann.com/nasa-climate-changes-due-to-shifts-in-solar-orbit-not-human-activity/
Barefaced argument by authority.
have built and run GCMs containing millions of lines of code
The idiot thinks bulk of code is a supporting argument. If anything, it argues against the models: the longer the code, the greater the chance of coding errors.
The most abundant "greenhouse gas" is WATER (93.5%), and there are so many variables in the H2O content and density that it IMPOSSIBLE to model.
CO2 comprises only 3.5% of the "greenhouse gases", so it is IMPOSSIBLE for it to the determinant component in any "warming" or "change" model.
As for his 1856 experiment:
"In 1856, American scientist Eunice Newton Foote conducted an experiment with an air pump, two glass cylinders and four thermometers. It showed that a cylinder containing carbon dioxide and placed in the sun trapped more heat and stayed warmer longer than a cylinder with normal air."
It is a CLOSED SYSTEM!!!
The Earth is NOT a Closed System and has an infinite number of variables that CAN NOT BE MODELED FOR!!!
Blah blah blah on what major oil companies spending ‘fighting’ this agenda.
Marxist Waters has already said she would seize these companies and Nationalize/Socialize them.
It’s about raw power and money.
F-k Communism.
This claim is grossly short-sighted. Yes, climate change can be influenced by sunspots/galactic cosmic rays but that is only a part of the picture. The major factors include changes in the solar orbit of the earth, along with alterations to the earth’s axial tilt. These variables are responsible for “warming” or “cooling.”
Human activity accounts for zero impact on climate change; humans can and do wreck their own environment, e.g. smog.
The distance the Earth is from the Sun varies by a significant distance, with attendant impact on temperatures. The axial tilt is another factor that correlates with the history of climate change over many millennia (thousands of years).
The Sun is the major player in climate change in our solar system.
Science 150 years old? Most tested? What idiocy and outright lying. Probably the stupidest GW statement I have seen, and that’s saying a lot.
How many times do they expect us to fall for this crap?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.