Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/02/2019 7:33:21 AM PDT by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Meatspace

Texts??? But but but....I thought texts were private conversations. Guess you gotta be real careful who your “friends” are.

Social media is another animal completely. Only stupid people toss out to the world every little thought that enters that pointy little head.


2 posted on 10/02/2019 7:40:42 AM PDT by Maskot (Put every dem/lib in prison........like yesterday!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Meatspace

Earlier reports (pre-trial) also had her exchanging very racy texts with her f-buddy, a fellow cop. She was evidently quite horny and arranging a later booty call. Naturally the media focus on the racist-seeming texts. It’s amazing how quickly this case went to trial and a verdict rendered.


3 posted on 10/02/2019 7:44:00 AM PDT by Blurb2350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Meatspace

The murdering racist bitch is getting what she deserves. She murdered a man in cold blood. Should get the death penalty.


4 posted on 10/02/2019 7:46:22 AM PDT by fatman6502002 ((The Team The Team The Team - Bo Schembechler circa 1969))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Meatspace
Doesn't have much to do with the facts of the case. This is just an attempt to portray her as a bad person deserving of more and greater punishment than an ordinary person who did what she did.

Surprised the Judge didn't put a stop to this. It's prejudicial and has nothing to do with the actual crime.

5 posted on 10/02/2019 7:47:29 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no oither sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Meatspace

Unless there is a specific connection to the actual crime then this information w\should not be coming before the jury.

I know this is in Texas but in California it is an abuse of judicial discretion.

Evidence Code section 352:

“The court in its discretion may exclude evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the probability that its admission will (a) necessitate undue consumption of time or (b) create substantial danger of undue prejudice, of confusing the issues, or of misleading the jury.”


20 posted on 10/02/2019 8:43:15 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson