Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: higgmeister

Not sure what the dispute is, but the case of Walter L. Nixon v United States 1993 is pretty clear that the Senate can use whatever rules they want and normal judicial procedures are irrelevant.


116 posted on 09/29/2019 12:54:14 PM PDT by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: jjotto
Not sure what the dispute is, but the case of Walter L. Nixon v United States 1993 is pretty clear that the Senate can use whatever rules they want and normal judicial procedures are irrelevant.

Just so, but the implication was that a trial in the Senate was a free-for-all with no leadership and that is not the case.

When I looked up your reference to Judge Nixon, it suggested looking at Powell vs. McCormack 1969 and that really made me feel old to remember at a glance that was Adam Clayton Powell and Speaker McCormack. So long ago now. Fifty years is a long time.

118 posted on 09/29/2019 1:56:39 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson