Is this the same guy that said Hillary had a 98 percent chance of winning in 2016?
RE: The Ukraine Scandal Is Looking Really Bad For Him
Why is that?
What about Joe Biden?
Who is this moron?
um... yeah.
Asking a foreign leader about one of our past Vice President’s corruption is SO BAD for Trump.!
Looks like Nate swallowed the hook, line and sinker too.
If this “Scandal” is so bad for Trump, wait a year and defeat him legit..so what’s the problem Nate, afraid that Trump can beat all those ass clowns on the Dem ticket
oh, ok Nate, he’s done for sure this time.
Ain’t this dude one of Hillary’s paid stooges?
Nate Silver is a liar. The truth is not in him.
Uh, nate. One pill makes you larger and one pill make you small and another one does nothing at all. Not sure which one or ones you consumed but it’s showing.
Yeah, Trump being cleared looks really bad for Trump. Jeez.
Democrats Wrote to Ukraine in May 2018, Demanding It Investigate Trump
Democrats wrote to the Ukrainian government in May 2018 urging it to continue investigations into President Donald Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia in the 2016 presidential campaign — collusion later found not to exist.
https://gellerreport.com/2019/09/democrats-ukraine-treason.html/
That's it man! Game over! We're toast, man, we're history! Maybe you haven’t been keeping up on current events, but we just got our asses kicked, pal! You can talk about Hunter Biden all you want, whoopdee f****n' do!
Last night Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham were all very good. Then Shannon Bream came on with a bunch of experts who seemed to think Trump was in deep trouble because of the Ukraine conversation. This “Republican strategist” (Bushite) Mike Murphy claimed that 30 Republican Senators would vote to convict Trump if they could vote secretly.
lol
This guy has the worst hair I’ve ever seen in my life.
During the night of the 2016 election, I couldn’t stop laughing.
When the article starts with BS it is pretty easy to see where it is going. The calls aren't recorded, but the transcript is from notes written as the call was going on. It isn't some kind of "reconstruction" it is a real time written record of what was said.
What the call transcript does show is that Trump and the president of Ukraine had a conversation during which Trump encouraged the president of Ukraine to continue investigations regarding election interference by people in that part of the world in 2016. Just like Senators Menendez, Durbin, and Leahy encouraged the government of Ukraine to investigate Paul Manafort as a part of the Mueller investigation.
The idea that somehow an investigation into possible corrupt actions is designed for political purposes seems to only apply to Republicans. Wasn't the entire Mueller affair really just a political effort by the Democrats to help them win seats in the 2018 midterms?
What’s the odds of the whistleblower backing out of testifying before Congress?
That’s going to be must see TV as the person will have to divulge who his/her sources were. Did those sources know their recollections were to be part of a complaint.
This ICIG has some issues too. He would have been directly involved in the FISA abuse investigation.
The people who support Trump aren't going to be swayed by this allegation. They are likely already distrustful of media narratives, and if they don't believe Trump outright, they are comforted by the fact that Biden literally (actual literally, not Biden's version of literally where he always means figuratively) bragged on camera about the very thing Trump said he did.
There are a lot of people not in either camp just tired by all this, probably enough to send ng a presidential election. They hate the noise, the unprofessionalism, the anxiety... All the Dems have to do to win this crowd over in 2020 is not act like a bunch of crazy fools until then and run a presidential candidate more appealing to the public than Trump. Thus far, they are failing and committed to more failing in the future.