Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

The North was always richer than the South...


7 posted on 09/26/2019 7:39:10 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jeffc

They also destroyed a lot of the built up wealth in the South.


23 posted on 09/26/2019 8:20:08 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: jeffc
The North was always richer than the South…
The South was systematically and intentionally backward.

50 posted on 09/26/2019 1:45:18 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: jeffc
The North was always richer than the South…
Always, after the 1850s. Millard Fillmore (July 9, 1850—March 4, 1853). . Franklin Pierce (March 4, 1853—March 4, 1857) James Buchanan (March 4, 1857—March 4, 1861).

All the presidents of the 1850s get, and to an extent deserve, a bad rap. But the net effect of their administrations was to keep the union intact throughout the decade. If the Civil War had started a decade earlier, the correlation of economic forces would have been quite different - and secession might very well have succeeded.


51 posted on 09/26/2019 1:53:20 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson