Chelsea’s a nothing. Sure, she got a wildly overpaid position as a nearly no-work no-show news commentator. And the Clinton Foundation probably paid for her wedding (as implied by Richard Band in the WikiLeaks releases). And her books are ghost-written influence-peddling payoffs.
But the real deal with the Clintons is the Clinton Foundation. Who donates, why, and how the money is spent. THAT is what needs to be investigated.
The question assumes Hunter B is going to get looked at. Dont count on it.
Heres another deal that fits the pattern: we (the people) are funding our own enemies.
Chelsea gets no show job, board positions (same as humper) thru direct or indirect gummit scams an conduit to direct $$ to buy influence from parents with tax deductible contributions.
Eg: book deals - see webb hubble; comey; mccabe
Eg: straight outta college, chelsea get $640k/yr job with tv network; bribe is disguised as advertising buy. Advertising expense is written off.
Eg: hedge fund losses to humper or mezvinsky = tax deductible bribes