Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IG Michael Horowitz testifies before congress (1.5 hr VIDEO: Live Streamed 2 hours ago)
youtube.com ^ | 9/18/19 | Congress

Posted on 09/18/2019 10:20:23 AM PDT by ransomnote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoJxreP1vVI

Note that the courtroom is almost completely empty because the Deep State players did not attend today's hearing with Horowitz; they didn't want to hear what he had to say about the IG report and they didn't want to use their right to ask him questions for 5 minutes.

I only caught the last 10 minutes of the hearing but based on what I heard, will definitely watch the rest.

RE the 10 minutes I watched: Meadows and Jordan were asking Horowitz about the IG report; Jordan confirmed with Horowitz that although the IG report documented matters of concern (e.g., Comey, McCabe, Clapper), others in congress had NOT asked him to follow up with further discussion or had questions.

Rep. Meadows said that today's hearing includes a referral to Horowitz to investigate inconsistency's in Comey's testimony vs. report. Another FREeper asked if a referral will be forwarded without the support of Chairman Nadler. If not, then Meadow's assertion is meant to educate the public further regarding the corruption in DC; white hats - pushing to elevate information the Deep State is trying to hide.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: comey; horowitz; ighorowitz; jordan; meadows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 09/18/2019 10:20:23 AM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

This is turning out to be as much of an embarrassment for Nadler as the Moulder hearing was. It’s clear he’s got nothing.


2 posted on 09/18/2019 10:34:08 AM PDT by DannyTN (He')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Isn’t it a little early for Horowitz.

The AG hasn’t released the report on FISA abuse. So all they have to talk about is Comey’s leaking.

Oh, maybe that’s why they are talking to him now, so that after the more incriminating report, they can say they already talked to him and there was nothing there.


3 posted on 09/18/2019 10:38:28 AM PDT by DannyTN (He')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Oh, maybe that’s why they are talking to him now, so that after the more incriminating report, they can say they already talked to him and there was nothing there.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Deep STaters weren’t present so they can’t say they already talked to him. The FISA abuse will have it’s own hearing so no one can say they already gave a hearing on that issue.


4 posted on 09/18/2019 10:41:54 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Good news! Comey has been referred by DOJ:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/sep/18/james-comey-referred-criminal-prosecution-justice-/


5 posted on 09/18/2019 10:42:57 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Wow! That needs it’s own thread.

7


6 posted on 09/18/2019 10:45:59 AM PDT by infool7 (Your mistakes are not what define you, it's how gracefully you recover from them that does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

“Isn’t it a little early for Horowitz.”

My first thought too.


7 posted on 09/18/2019 10:47:31 AM PDT by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I’m puzzled. I thought DOJ already decided they wouldn’t try to prosecute Comey.


8 posted on 09/18/2019 10:50:02 AM PDT by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Article at link reiterates the old news that supposedly the DOJ won’t prosecute.


9 posted on 09/18/2019 10:51:02 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Are the deep staters afraid of Horowitz?


10 posted on 09/18/2019 10:57:23 AM PDT by DannyTN (He')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
Good news! Comey has been referred by DOJ

That's actually old news. IG criminally referred Comey to DOJ which they may have confirmed today. But DOJ declined to prosecute which we knew a few weeks ago.
11 posted on 09/18/2019 11:30:12 AM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: be-baw
I’m puzzled. I thought DOJ already decided they wouldn’t try to prosecute Comey.

You're correct. If Horowitz happened to mention it today, it's not very big news. We knew about this a while ago. I think people are thinking that there has been some new criminal referral, or that the DOJ has decided to pursue charges...but there hasn't and they haven't, at least to my knowledge.
12 posted on 09/18/2019 11:32:13 AM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mmichaels1970

No - the MSM is already distorting the facts. Today’s hearing is separate and Meadows said a rsult of the hearing is that he’s referring COmey to the IG.

Here are two posts I made on another thread re this issue:
~~~
I think the article is distorting the truth. I just watched this morning’s congressional hearing with Horowitz in which Rep. Meadows said that the outcome of today’s hearing is that Comey is referred to Horowitz and Horowitz acknowledged that.

So the article provides old news at the top and then white washes today’s request for referral:

I’ll put a quote below but Meadows did not ask Horowitz to “look into allegations”; Meadows said a result of today’s hearing is that he is referring Comey to the IG re the content of the IG’s report. Here’s the white washed excerpt from the very bottom of the article:

“Rep. Mark Meadows, North Carolina Republican, asked Mr. Horowitz if he would look into allegations Mr. Comey lied during his 2017 Senate testimony. Mr. Meadows said he believes there were “numerous” times where the ex-FBI director’s testimony did not match revelations included in the inspector general report.”
~~~~
More distortion from the article:

“Mr. Comey in May 2017 asked a law professor friend to share with The New York Times a memo detailing his conversations with President Trump in order to pressure the Justice Department to open an investigation of the president.”

This is what Comey says but the article states it as fact. In the hearing itself today - Jordan notes that Comey’s statement that he said leaked to open an investigation contrasts with his conduct reported in the IG report.

The MSM has really put up a hall of mirrors.
~~~


13 posted on 09/18/2019 11:36:18 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
The Justice Department ultimately decided not to prosecute Mr. Comey
14 posted on 09/18/2019 12:05:35 PM PDT by Rapscallion (If they are not for Trump, they are against him. Fire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
No - the MSM is already distorting the facts. Today’s hearing is separate and Meadows said a rsult of the hearing is that he’s referring COmey to the IG.

Interesting. So after hearing Horowitz on Comey, Meadows said he was referring Comey to the IG, who, in fact, is Horowitz. Which is separate from Horowitz referring Comey to the DOJ previously.....Did I get that?

The MSM has really put up a hall of mirrors.

I mean that SEEMS like a hall of mirrors to me already...confusing.
15 posted on 09/18/2019 12:11:03 PM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mmichaels1970

Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows have several examples where Comey’s congressional testimony conflicts with the IG report that was just released. They will formally report those conflicting statements to the IG for review, and the IG said he will review them. Seems fairly straight forward to me. I mean, Jordan and Meadows could not have known about the conflict before the IG released his report, right?


16 posted on 09/18/2019 12:21:01 PM PDT by euclid216
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: euclid216

Gotcha. So screwballs like me are confusing “referral to the IG” with “referral to the DOJ”, right?


17 posted on 09/18/2019 12:25:45 PM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Is that a REAL picture??? Wher is everyone??


18 posted on 09/18/2019 12:26:52 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

congress (1.5 hr VIDEO: Live Streamed 2 hours ago), Ann Archy wrote:
Is that a REAL picture??? Wher is everyone??
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Deep Staters didn’t attend. Kind of interesting to see what the good guys are up against - surrounded by bad guys employing every method at their disposal to distort, hide, down play, conceal etc.


19 posted on 09/18/2019 12:34:43 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mmichaels1970

I apologize for the confusion I’ve introduced by trying to post when I don’t actually have time - so I’ve done a messy job. Again, my apologies.


20 posted on 09/18/2019 12:37:13 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson