To: DUMBGRUNT
Very good post and thread, thank you.
Makes me wonder what how much more advanced the SR-72 must be, if, uh....if it exists.
4 posted on
09/14/2019 6:00:04 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: gaijin
It’s probably set up to run with ethanol.
6 posted on
09/14/2019 6:03:14 PM PDT by
wally_bert
(Hola. Me llamo Inspector Carlton Lassiter. Me gusta queso.)
To: gaijin
It would likely have a different designation anyway.
7 posted on
09/14/2019 6:08:02 PM PDT by
wastedyears
(The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
To: gaijin
There were unconfirmed reports about the SR-72 dating back to 2007, when various sources disclosed that Lockheed Martin was developing an airplane able to fly six times the speed of sound or Mach 6 (4,000 mph; 6,400 km/h; 3,500 kn) for the United States Air Force.[ Lockheed Martin Skunk Works’ development work on the SR-72 was first published by Aviation Week & Space Technology on 1 November 2013.Public attention to the news was large enough to overwhelm the Aviation Week servers.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_SR-72
10 posted on
09/14/2019 6:33:38 PM PDT by
DUMBGRUNT
("The enemy has overrun us. We are blowing up everything. Vive la France!"Dien Bien Phu last message.)
To: gaijin
With what the X-37B space plane can do, and its multi-year endurance on-orbit, there’s no real need for an ultra expensive air-breathing manned vehicle.
17 posted on
09/14/2019 7:44:09 PM PDT by
Tallguy
(Facts be d@mned! The narrative must be protected at all costs!)
To: gaijin
24 posted on
09/15/2019 1:04:22 AM PDT by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: gaijin
28 posted on
09/15/2019 4:12:00 AM PDT by
Hot Tabasco
(I'm in the cleaning business.......I launder money)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson